toolcurrent
Navigation

Explore

Cline logo

Cline

Open SourceDevelopment Last updated: May 10, 2026

Cline is a free open-source autonomous AI coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains with BYO API key, 30+ LLM providers, and per-step approval workflows.

Our General Score

8.7/10
Functionality9.0
Features8.8
Usability7.5
Value9.5
Integrations8.5
Reliability8.0

Plans & Pricing

Use Cases

Coding

9.2

Cline autonomously creates and edits files across an entire codebase, runs terminal commands, and drives a browser for UI verification with per-step developer approval — covering the full agentic coding workflow within VS Code or JetBrains without switching editors, and supporting any LLM via BYO API key at direct provider rates with no markup.

Automation

8.5

Plan/Act mode separates task planning from execution enabling structured multi-step automation; MCP (Model Context Protocol) allows Cline to extend its own toolset with custom integrations for databases, observability platforms, and internal tools; spend limits and YOLO mode let developers tune autonomy vs oversight trade-offs per workflow.

Research

7.2

Codebase indexing enables Cline to understand and navigate large unfamiliar repositories, and browser automation via Puppeteer allows documentation retrieval and web-based research during coding tasks, but Cline is a coding agent — it does not provide academic literature search, citation management, or general research capabilities outside programming workflows.

Platforms

DesktopBrowser ExtensionAPI

Capabilities

Context WindowN/A
API PricingN/A
Image Generation✗ No
Memory Persistence◑ Partial
Computer Use✓ Yes
API Available✗ No
Multimodal◑ Partial
Open Source✓ Yes
Browser Extension✗ No

Overview

Cline (formerly Claude Dev) is an Apache 2.0 open-source autonomous AI coding agent running as a VS Code and JetBrains extension with 5M+ installs. It creates and edits files, runs terminal commands, and drives a browser via Puppeteer, asking for developer approval before each action. Plan/Act mode separates planning from execution for structured control. Cline supports 30+ LLM providers including Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, and local models via Ollama, with BYO API keys and no markup via Cline Provider. The extension is free; individual API costs typically run $5–50/month. Teams plan is $20/user/month with the first 10 seats permanently free. The side panel output interface is less polished than Cursor's inline view per community feedback. Heavy daily use can reach $100+/month in API costs.

Key Features

  • Per-step developer approval workflow requiring explicit confirmation before each file edit, terminal command, or browser action
  • Plan/Act mode separating planning from execution with snapshot checkpoints for rollback on complex multi-step tasks
  • 30+ LLM provider support including Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Mistral, and local models via Ollama with BYO API keys
  • MCP (Model Context Protocol) enabling Cline to extend its toolset with custom integrations from the MCP Marketplace
  • Browser automation via Puppeteer for UI verification, documentation retrieval, and web-based tasks during coding sessions
  • .clinerules/ directory for version-controlled coding standards and conditional rules enforced per file or project scope

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extension is free at $0 with BYO API key — individual developers with light use pay $5–10/month in direct API costs versus Cursor's flat $20/month subscription or GitHub Copilot's $10/month, with no Cline markup on inference
  • First 10 Teams seats are permanently free — early-stage startups and small engineering teams access centralized billing and role-based access control at no cost up to 10 developers
  • 30+ LLM providers with BYO API key eliminate vendor lock-in — users can switch between Claude Opus, GPT-4, DeepSeek, or local Ollama models per task or cost optimization without changing tools or editor
  • MCP (Model Context Protocol) allows Cline to extend its own toolset with database connectors, observability platforms, and custom internal tools from the MCP Marketplace — beyond what IDE-embedded tools like Copilot support

Cons

  • Side panel output interface is less visually integrated than Cursor's inline diff and chat view — a documented community complaint that makes reviewing AI-generated changes more cumbersome for developers accustomed to Cursor's UI
  • Heavy daily use accumulates $100+/month in LLM API costs depending on model selection — at this level, the cost exceeds Cursor Pro ($20/month) or GitHub Copilot Pro ($10/month) flat-rate subscriptions for the same period
  • Per-step approval slows development velocity for experienced users who want more autonomy — requiring configuration of YOLO mode or spend limits to disable approval gates for trusted task types
  • Teams pricing at $20/user/month after Q1 2026 for seats beyond the first 10 adds cost overhead for organizations with 15+ developers where the free seat limit is insufficient for full team adoption

Who It's For

Best For

  • VS Code and JetBrains developers who want agentic coding within their existing editor without switching to Cursor or installing a new IDE
  • Individual developers and freelancers with variable monthly coding volumes where BYO API pay-per-use is cheaper than flat subscription tools
  • Startups with up to 10 engineers who need free team-level centralized billing and role-based access control for agentic coding
  • Security-conscious developers who need local model support via Ollama for privacy-sensitive codebases where cloud API calls are restricted
  • Teams that need MCP extensibility to connect their AI coding agent to internal databases, observability platforms, and custom tooling

Not Ideal For

  • Developers whose primary need is real-time inline autocomplete within the code editor, where GitHub Copilot or Cursor provide tighter IDE integration than Cline's side panel interface
  • Heavy daily users where LLM API costs at $100+/month exceed the cost of Cursor Pro ($20/month flat) or GitHub Copilot Pro ($10/month flat) for equivalent or lower workloads
  • Non-developers including product managers, designers, and content creators whose workflows do not involve file editing, terminal commands, or codebase navigation
  • Teams of 15+ developers where the 10 free Teams seats are insufficient and the $20/user/month cost for additional seats adds to total tool overhead

Audience Scores

Free VS Code/JetBrains extension with BYO API key means individual developers pay only for actual LLM inference ($5–50/month typical) versus Cursor's flat $20/month or GitHub Copilot's $10/month, with 30+ model options, per-step approval for safety, and MCP for custom tool integration without any subscription commitment.

First 10 Teams seats permanently free eliminates upfront cost for early-stage engineering teams; BYO API model means no Cline subscription overhead on top of existing Claude or OpenAI API contracts; and Apache 2.0 license enables custom deployment and modification without licensing restrictions.

Free extension with pay-per-use API billing means freelancers with variable monthly workloads pay only for actual usage — months with light coding cost $5–10 in API versus Cursor's flat $20/month, and local model support via Ollama enables cost-free AI coding for privacy-sensitive client projects.

30+ LLM provider support including local Ollama models enables privacy-sensitive data science workflows where code cannot interact with cloud APIs; codebase indexing understands complex ML pipeline repositories; and MCP integration allows connection to data infrastructure tools — though Cline is not specialized for data science and lacks data exploration or visualization capabilities.

Consider These Instead

When Not To Choose Cline

Choose Cursor over Cline when a polished IDE replacement with tightly integrated inline AI, visual diff review, and a flat $20/month cost regardless of usage volume is preferred over Cline's side panel interface and variable API cost model. Choose Aider over Cline when a terminal-based workflow with git-first automatic commits and no IDE or editor dependency is preferred at the same BYO API key cost model. Choose Claude Code over Cline when Anthropic's purpose-built terminal agent with Agent Teams for parallel multi-agent workflows and 1M token context is required within a Claude-specific ecosystem rather than Cline's multi-provider agnostic approach.

Integrations

Vs CodeJetbrainsClaude ApiOpenai ApiOllamaMcp Marketplace

Known Limitations

feature gappricing complexityaccuracy variabilitylearning curve